Therapy is an essential mental health practice for patients due to the positive short and long-term rehabilitative effects. Different treatment remedies pose distinctive effect to the clients hence the prominence in identifying the risks and mitigations. Transcendentally, the margin between individual and group counseling encompasses the ideological necessity from the practitioner. Group counseling is a therapeutic perspective that profoundly empowers the professional through an apt observation on interactive quotient while the phenomenon risks the psychological comfort among the ill personnel.
Group counseling poses significant psychological risks to the patients on account of the reliance on an effective and functional safe social environment. According to the researchers, group counseling poses dynamic benefits and risks to the clients (Cooper et al., 2019). An excellent example of a positive approach entails the exposure of the counterparts to a safe, controlled, and social support system. Group admonition further empowers the practitioner based on the opportunity to observe behavioral codes among psychologically ill persons while interacting with each other. However, the group framework fosters distinctive psychological risks to the members and therapists’ proficiency in the service delivery structure.
Despite the essence of creating a safe social environment, different clients perceive the process dynamically. Psychological risks associated with group membership entail loss of trust among patients, extreme discomfort among the socially phobic characters, feeling of rejection due to compromised attention, and imminent wrangles among counterparts on perceptive appeals (Heydarpour et al., 2018). The practitioner’s core responsibility is to implement a mainframe to minimize imperilment. Research establishes that it is crucial that professionals develop rules for steering group counseling while ensuring the adept involvement of all counterparts (Heydarpour et al., 2018). Intensified interactions among members significantly contribute to building trust and delimiting the privacy principle.
Consequently, group counseling is a rehabilitative strategy among the psychologically and mentally ill personnel influenced by professionalism and members’ engagement. The key challenges on group membership enshrine feeling of rejection, personality clashes, discomfort, and loss of trust. Therefore, it is vital the practitioner incorporate strategies that intensify the participatory quotient among the patients. The initiative boosts individuals’ social skills and self-esteem within the constructed safe environment.
References
Cooper, S. E., Campbell, L. F., & Smucker Barnwell, S. (2019). Telepsychology: A primer for counseling psychologists. The Counseling Psychologist, 47(8), 1074-1114. Web.
Heydarpour, S., Parvane, E., Saqqezi, A., Ziapour, A., Dehghan, F., & Parvaneh, A. (2018). Effectiveness of group counseling based on the reality therapy on resilience and psychological well-being of mothers with an intellectual disabled child. International Journal of Pediatrics, 6(6), 7851-7860. Web.